Questionnaires to both on-island residents and off-island
land-owners regarding the building of a shared vision for Great Barrier
Island (as part of a wider programme of work called Integrated
planning and management of natural areas for tourism-related development
was undertaken by the Centre for Research, Evaluation & Social
Assessment, otherwise known as CRESA, an independent research
organisation based in Wellington. The analysis of the on-island
questionnaire (prepared by Julie Warren), has now been published, the
off-island property-owners questionnaire analysis having been prepared
and published back in September 2004.
129 people
responded to the on-island questionnaire of 500 sent out, partly because
many people simply never received the questionnaire and related papers.
Auckland City are currently talking to NZ Post at a high level, and some
official announcement will presumably be made, it being of no value
whatsoever speculating on the reason(s) for the failure of the mail-out
process. A cloud of a size hard to calculate therefore presently hangs
over the value of the on-island report. Auckland City Council planners
will be keeping a keen interest in the results of the project because
issues and concerns that are identified through the shared vision
process can be incorporated into planning.
Although to
what extent the on-island analysis can be trusted is open to question,
the off-island property owners questionnaire analysis report prepared by
Luke Procter of CRESA was based on a 19% response by 125 people from a
mail-out to over 650 property owners.
Appreciation
for the Barrier’s natural character seemed to come through again and
again in both on and off-shore analyses.
The Great
Barrier Island Charitable Trust’s vision of ‘a pest-free island
attracting national and international visitors with an interest in the
unique biotic and cultural heritage of NZ’ would certainly
seem to have some potential consistency with various of the concerns and
aspirations as expressed in the CRESA analysis. See the analysis
tabulated below.
The
methodology by which this vision-building exercise has been carried out
is certainly impressive, and the mailout failure regrettable. However,
the process demonstrates that it is possible to tease out the concerns
and aspirations of a group of people such as have an interest in the
Barrier.
If a
pest-free Great Barrier is ultimately what a significant number of
concerned Barrier residents and off-shore landowners want, then three
things are apparent from the CRESA vision building exercises;
1. The
widespread existing recognition in both reports for the Barrier’s
natural values.
2. The
impressive methodology of the vision-building exercise run by CRESA,
which could be emulated at any future stage by the GBICT as a very
useful tool.
3. The GBICT
stands out as the ideal vehicle to become a part of and support for
those residents and off-island landowners who can see potential in the
concept of a pest-free Great Barrier and who want to do something
concrete about it.
